Epistemic justice and epistemic authority: the example of autism

Lecture by Professor Amandine Catala, “Epistemic justice and epistemic authority: the example of autism”, as part of the Summer Seminar for Diversity in Philosophy.

Conference summary Autistic people often face multiple forms of epistemic injustice in many contexts, whether medical, clinical, familial, social, professional or academic. Epistemic injustice often undermines the epistemic authority that autistic people have about their own experience of themselves and the world. In this presentation, I identify and defend criteria that justify epistemic authority about autism and cultivate greater epistemic justice for autistic people. This process of identifying criteria proves useful not only for autism but also for other axes of intersectionality and social identity, such as gender, racialization, disability, etc.

Speaker’s biography Amandine Catala is Associate Professor in the Department of Philosophy at the Université du Québec à Montréal, where she holds the Canada Research Chair in Epistemic Injustice and Agency. Her research in social, political and feminist philosophy focuses on epistemic injustice and agency in relation to issues such as the under-representation of certain groups in certain fields, colonialism, public deliberation, think tanks, linguistic justice, disability and neurodiversity. Amandine Catala received her PhD in philosophy from the University of Colorado at Boulder, and has completed internships and postdoctoral fellowships at the London School of Economics, the Australian National University, and the Université de Louvain.

Version with LSQ interpretation: